The Squeaky Pig Speaks!

Tuesday, July 19, 2005

Not Such a Good Choice for the Supreme Court?

After listening to the glowing endorsements by a couple of liberal pundits on NPR while coming home from the gym, I had assumed that Bush's nomination of John G. Roberts to the Supreme Court was actually a (surprisingly) good move, from a progressive point of view. I say "surprisingly" because as this is Bush's final term as president he certainly had nothing to lose by appointing a hardline conservative to the post. (Well, perhaps he mightn't have anything to lose, but his political party probably would have suffered a backlash in the next round of elections.) But considering how uncompromising Bush has been in his nominations (his nomination of that thug John Bolton as ambassador to the U.N. comes to mind), I felt like he'd had something of a change of heart.

Not so fast, el Piggo. After surfing around a little, it would appear that Mr. Roberts actually does come with some baggage in the form of a conservative agenda. Just read up a little on his record on separation of church and state, civil rights, abortion, habeas corpus, and so on. He's definitely tilted to the right.

I'm seeing a number of liberals on the Web decrying this nomination as the end of all things. The Alliance for Justice, an alliance of environmental, civil rights, mental health, women's, children's and consumer advocacy organizations that opposed Roberts' confirmation to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, is none too happy about Roberts's nomination. Then, there are others like me who aren't too thrilled but acknowledge that it could have been worse (how about arch-fascist Alberto Gonzales for starters?).

Of course, many liberal conspiracy theorists are convinced that Dubya will pull his ace from his hole (so to speak) by nominating an über-conservative to replace Rehnquist in the next year or two.

So is Roberts the wrong choice? Maybe, maybe not. The consensus seems to be that we just don't know enough about the guy. He's very young (50) for one thing. But is he an extremist? My gut feeling is no, but I've been wrong plenty of times before. This guy could be a Manchurian Candidate, ready to unveil a radical-right agenda at any moment. If in the near future women have to resort to coat hangers, high school graduations include religious ceremonies, affirmative action and Title IX get overturned, and endangered species lose even more of their protections, we'll know the answer.

posted by The Squeaky Pig at 8:54 PM 0 comments

Contributors

  • The Squeaky Pig
  • The Squeaky Pig
www.flickr.com
jonworth's photos More of jonworth's photos

Links

  • Site Feed: Subscribe and read this blog in your newsreader
  • The Squeaky Pig: Jon Worth's art, music and other nonsense
  • A Line in the Sand:Army milblog on the Iraq occupation
  • Iraq Coalition Casualties: The ugly truth
  • Liberal Slant: Watching the conservative-owned liberal media
  • Truthout: Lets get the Truth Out, changing things for the better through information
  • Greenpeace: Let's respect our planet
  • NRDC BioGems: Saving endangered wild places
  • The Humane Society of the United States: Promoting the protection of ALL animals
  • PETA: Animals are not ours to eat
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital: Finding cures and saving children with pediatric cancer and other catastrophic diseases

Previous Posts

  • The Pig has retired
  • My dead blog
  • Bad B.O.
  • Long overdue...
  • Blue Ridge Mountains, NC
  • Lawn Care Nightmares
  • "What is a terrorist?"
  • The Framing of Immigration
  • British Special Forces Caught Carrying Out Staged ...
  • U.S. military acknowledges Iraq anti-gay killings

Archives

  • Apr 20, 2005
  • May 8, 2005
  • May 9, 2005
  • May 12, 2005
  • May 16, 2005
  • May 17, 2005
  • May 18, 2005
  • May 20, 2005
  • May 23, 2005
  • May 24, 2005
  • May 25, 2005
  • May 26, 2005
  • May 27, 2005
  • May 28, 2005
  • May 31, 2005
  • Jun 1, 2005
  • Jun 3, 2005
  • Jun 4, 2005
  • Jun 6, 2005
  • Jun 7, 2005
  • Jun 8, 2005
  • Jun 9, 2005
  • Jun 10, 2005
  • Jun 11, 2005
  • Jun 12, 2005
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • Jun 16, 2005
  • Jun 17, 2005
  • Jun 18, 2005
  • Jun 20, 2005
  • Jun 21, 2005
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • Jun 24, 2005
  • Jun 25, 2005
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • Jun 28, 2005
  • Jul 3, 2005
  • Jul 4, 2005
  • Jul 5, 2005
  • Jul 6, 2005
  • Jul 10, 2005
  • Jul 12, 2005
  • Jul 14, 2005
  • Jul 15, 2005
  • Jul 16, 2005
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • Jul 20, 2005
  • Jul 23, 2005
  • Jul 26, 2005
  • Aug 1, 2005
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • Aug 15, 2005
  • Aug 17, 2005
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • Aug 23, 2005
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • Aug 27, 2005
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • Sep 1, 2005
  • Sep 2, 2005
  • Sep 3, 2005
  • Sep 4, 2005
  • Sep 8, 2005
  • Sep 9, 2005
  • Sep 10, 2005
  • Sep 11, 2005
  • Sep 15, 2005
  • Sep 19, 2005
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • Sep 28, 2005
  • Oct 2, 2005
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • Oct 5, 2005
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • Oct 13, 2005
  • Oct 19, 2005
  • Oct 20, 2005
  • Oct 23, 2005
  • Oct 25, 2005
  • Oct 26, 2005
  • Oct 28, 2005
  • Oct 31, 2005
  • Nov 2, 2005
  • Nov 4, 2005
  • Nov 7, 2005
  • Nov 9, 2005
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • Nov 21, 2005
  • Dec 1, 2005
  • Dec 8, 2005
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • Dec 30, 2005
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • Jan 5, 2006
  • Jan 6, 2006
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • Jan 20, 2006
  • Jan 21, 2006
  • Jan 28, 2006
  • Jan 29, 2006
  • Jan 30, 2006
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • Feb 22, 2006
  • Mar 7, 2006
  • Apr 22, 2006
  • Apr 25, 2006
  • Jun 3, 2006
  • Jun 11, 2006
  • Jun 13, 2006
  • Jul 6, 2006
  • Jul 26, 2006
  • Aug 5, 2006
  • Aug 11, 2006
  • Nov 8, 2006
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • Sep 27, 2007
  • Aug 4, 2008

Powered by Blogger

Go to top of page
Squeaky Pig footer